FREE UK Delivery. 96% In Stock. Card payments accepted. ALL Prices include UK Delivery + 20% VAT
There are no products in your cart.
There are no products in your wishlist.
Solenoid valves with ATEX EExiaIICT6 and T4 protection
ATEX stands for (ATmosphere EXplosive) being a flammable or combustible gases, fluids, mists or dusts in air (with oxygen) so that if there was any ignition source (spark / sufficient heat) the combustion process could ignite the flammable mixture.
There are known limits in which a flammable substance would need to be a certain concentration (not too rich or lean) but sound engineering advice for any application where potentially hazardous media could ever be present is - BE PROTECTED AT ALL COSTS and seek professional advice from an ATEX certified qualified engineer.
The European Union has implemented two harmonised standards for hazardous areas - ATEX 94/9/EC (ATEX 100a) and from April 2016 2014/34/UE and ATEX 99/92/EC (ATEX137). Ratings are classed according to the area or zone being protected.
Below are some ATEX basics relating to ATEX certified solenoid valves, and you can click this link to see our range of ATEX products.
Zone | Category | Presence of explosion atmospheres |
Group II equipment | ||
zone 0 | category 1 G | Continuous, frequent |
zone 20 | category 1 D | |
| ||
zone 1 | category 2 G | Intermittent |
zone 21 | category 2 D | |
| ||
zone 2 | category 3 G | Occasional or for short periods |
zone 22 | category 3 D |
Firstly, I must emphasize that ATEX EExm encapsulated solenoid coils in general and accordingly the Ex coils are indeed not meant to be subjected to outdoor environmental strain.
Almost all customers know by sound engineering practice that this cannot be achieved without being tested accordingly, however this fact is not stated explicitly in ATEX product documentation.
How does one know or deduct from the facts given?
a) The IP-Code standard EN/IEC 60529 is not referring to environmental conditions, whereas the American NEMA 250 does: Outdoor Corrosion Protection Test, External Icing Test.
Thus, it is erroneous to derive from an IP-Code 65 suitability for outdoor applications. Outdoor strains are so diverse that you cannot cope for all conditions prevailing at the possible geographical places with a simple IP test done. No way.
You will find that the EN/IEC 60068 series of standards has numerous parts that deal with those kinds of strains, none of them is required for Ex certification.
b) It is true that water protection is required by the Ex standards, some require IPx5, IPx4 but even IPx0 is allowed, see Ex 'e' EN 60079-7. This is not absolute water tightness, and we can deduct that water is not a direct cause for arcing even when in contact with blank current carrying parts (as allowed in 'e' EN 60079-7).
You cited "A protection concept whereby equipment that could potentially cause an ignition is encapsulated within a compound or resin to prevent contact with the explosive atmosphere". Yes, it is the explosive atmosphere that must be kept out, this is not water.
c) Note that the tests for IPX5 are very short regarding the period of time that water is applied when compared to water strains outdoor.
Water creeping into the coil would cause creeping currents therein. Small amounts will evaporate by thermal energy. This would do no harm.
Being exposed frequently and long-lasting to water will lead to degradation of the isolating features with a resulting failure thereof and further current rise, meaning excess power and heat in the coil.
In this respect, water is critical must be avoided for a reliable installation.
The possible fault of a failing isolation within the coil is covered by the mandatory application of a suitable current fuse, see certificate and operating instructions. Please remind your customer in case you doubt that he follows the prescriptions made.
d) 'Outside usage is possible but not uncovered' had been mentioned below.
Well, no. Outside usage does mean more than rain from above as explained earlier, a cover may be helpful in some respect but is not considered to be sufficient.
These are our points, though very technical, I hope you will find it explanatory.
Fuel or Chemical | Temperature | |
(oC) | (oF) | |
Acetaldehyde | 175 | 347 |
Acetone | 465 | 869 |
Acetylene | 305 | 581 |
Anthracite - glow point | 600 | 1112 |
Benzene | 560 | 1040 |
Bituminous coal - glow point | 454 | 850 |
Butane | 420 | 788 |
Carbon | 700 | 1292 |
Carbon - bi sulphide | 149 | 300 |
Carbon monoxide | 609 | 1128 |
Charcoal | 349 | 660 |
Coal-tar oil | 580 | 1076 |
Coke | 700 | 1292 |
Cyclohexane | 245 | 473 |
Diethyl ether | 160 | 320 |
Ethane | 515 | 859 |
Ethylene | 490 | 914 |
Ethyl Alcohol | 365 | 689 |
Fuel Oil No.1 | 210 | 410 |
Fuel Oil No.2 | 256 | 494 |
Fuel Oil No.4 | 262 | 505 |
Heavy hydrocarbons | 750 | 1382 |
Hydrogen | 500 | 932 |
Gas oil | 336 | 637 |
Gasoline | 280 | 536 |
Gun Cotton | 221 | 430 |
Kerosene | 295 | 563 |
Isobutane | 462 | 864 |
Isobutene | 465 | 869 |
Iso octane | 447 | 837 |
Iso pentane | 420 | 788 |
Isopropyl Alcohol | 399 | 750 |
Light gas | 600 | 1112 |
Light hydrocarbons | 650 | 1202 |
Lignite - glow point | 526 | 979 |
Methane (Natural Gas) | 580 | 1076 |
Methyl Alcohol | 385 | 725 |
Naphtha | 550 | 1022 |
Neohexane | 425 | 797 |
Neopentane | 450 | 842 |
Nitro-glycerine | 254 | 490 |
n-Butane | 405 | 761 |
n-Heptane | 215 | 419 |
n-Hexane | 225 | 437 |
n-Octane | 220 | 428 |
n-Pentane | 260 | 500 |
n-Pentene | 298 | 569 |
Oak Wood - dry | 482 | 900 |
Peat | 227 | 440 |
Petroleum | 400 | 752 |
Pine Wood - dry | 427 | 800 |
Phosphorous, amorphous | 260 | 500 |
Phosphorous, transparent | 49 | 120 |
Production gas | 750 | 1382 |
Propane | 480 | 842 |
Propylene | 458 | 856 |
p-Xylene | 530 | 986 |
Rifle Powder | 288 | 550 |
Toluene | 530 | 849 |
Semi anthracite coal | 400 | 752 |
Semi bituminous coal - glow point | 527 | 980 |
Styrene | 490 | 914 |
Sulphur | 243 | 470 |
Wood | 300 | 572 |
Xylene | 463 | 867 |